electric vehicle parked next to row of chargers

It’s no secret that the Biden administration has strongly emphasized clean energy and electric vehicles (EVs). With the backing of industrial policy, the EV market is evolving rapidly, driven by the hype cycle surrounding it. This article will explore how the combination of industrial policy and the EV hype cycle is causing a glut before the flood of new models and pricing options and what it means for the future of the industry.

Industrial Policy and its Influence on the EV Industry

The Biden administration’s focus on clean energy and EVs manifests in various initiatives, such as clean energy tax credits, loans, and encouragement for EV manufacturing and infrastructure. These efforts are reminiscent of America’s historical industrial policy, where the government has actively shaped the nation’s economic trajectory.

The influence of industrial policy on the EV industry is clear, with the government driving investment and development in the sector. This has led to a surge in both interest and production of electric vehicles as automakers and investors respond to government incentives and the promise of a greener future.

The Electric Vehicle Hype Cycle

The hype cycle is a well-known phenomenon that describes the way new technologies and industries go through phases of inflated expectations, disillusionment, and eventual maturity. In the case of the EV industry, the hype cycle has led to heightened consumer expectations and demand for electric vehicles. This has spurred automakers and investors to pour resources into EV development, sometimes at the expense of careful planning and foresight.

The Glut Before the Flood: Implications of Industrial Policy and the EV Hype Cycle

The combination of industrial policy and the EV hype cycle has resulted in accelerated production of electric vehicles and their components. This has led to some concerning consequences, including:

  1. Overinvestment and overcapacity: With so many automakers and investors rushing to capitalize on the EV hype, there is a risk of overinvestment and overcapacity in the industry. This could lead to market saturation and diminishing returns for investors and manufacturers alike.
  2. Shortages in critical resources: The rapid growth of the EV industry has also led to shortages in critical resources, such as batteries and raw materials. This can constrain the industry’s ability to grow sustainably and lead to further market instability.

These factors contribute to a glut in the EV market, which can cause price fluctuations and limit the availability of new models in the short term. Eventually, however, this glut could give way to a flood of new models and pricing options as the industry adjusts to consumer demand and market realities.

Strategies for Managing the Glut

To mitigate the risks associated with the EV glut, a combination of government regulation, oversight, and industry collaboration and coordination will be necessary. This could include measures to ensure sustainable growth in the EV sector, such as incentivizing the use of recycled materials or investing in battery recycling infrastructure.


The interplay between industrial policy and the EV hype cycle has undoubtedly shaped the current state of the electric vehicle market. While this has led to a glut of production and investment, the potential benefits of a well-managed transition to electric vehicles remain immense. By proactively addressing the glut and ensuring sustainable growth, the EV industry can ultimately achieve its goal of transforming transportation for a greener, cleaner future.